15.04.2021 - 15.07.2021 CITAS - Center for International and Transnational Area Studies, Regensburg

This interdisciplinary lecture series therefore offers a multiperspectival reconceptualization of area studies and relevant concepts of space in dialog with the “Global South”. The series seeks to demonstrate the necessity of revising certain scholarly and cultural paradigms, while pointing towards ways of achieving dialogic reconfigurations of knowledge production.

[read on...]
Rev. by Anna Mashi, Historisches Seminar, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg

Der Erste Weltkrieg und seine Folgen lösten einen dramatischen Wandel in der Zugehörigkeitsbestimmung von Millionen von Menschen aus. Im Rahmen von politisch und religiös motivierten Ausbürgerungen und als Folge des Zerfalls der multiethnischen Imperien sowie unterschiedlicher Staatsgründungen in Ost-, Ostmittel- und Südosteuropa wurden sie staatenlos – und stellten damit ein Problem für den souveränen Nationalstaat und die internationale Politik dar.

[read on...]
By Nataša Jagdhuhn

In its very conception, the museum as an institution functions as a symbol and social lever for the consolidation of the Eurocentric idea of “universal knowledge” production, while concurrently serving the purpose of “civilizing” the “Other”. With the liberation of African countries from colonial grip following World War II, and especially in the 1960s and 1970s, debates around decolonizing museums gained importance among the newly established international circles of museum professionals.

[read on...]
Conference Reports
21.09.2020 - 01.10.2020 Post-Socialist and Comparative Memory Studies working group of the Memory Studies Association (PoSoCoMeS)
By Anežka Brožová, Charles University Prague; Rose Smith / Klára Žaloudková, Charles University Prague / University of Groningen; Anna Herran, University of Toronto

The Post-socialist and Comparative Memory Studies working group of the Memory Studies Association (PoSoCoMeS) held its first conference online, encouraging meaningful dialogue among scholars studying different geographical areas. In doing so, the working group contributed to high scholarly standards for post-socialist memory studies across disciplines and created a global framework for academic dialogue on post-socialist memory.

[read on...]